Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Salvatore Caruso vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Caruso vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Salvatore Caruso vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Caruso 2 - 0 Ilkel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Caruso has won 48.58% of points on their second serve, while Ilkel has won 46.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Caruso, in recent form, has won 56.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 50.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.33% and 25.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Caruso has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 51.97% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Caruso has won 51.85% of matches played (W/L 28/ 26), with Ilkel winning 40.82% (W/L 20/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Caruso has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 255/ 197), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 41/ 54). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Caruso has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.63% of matches (W/L 13/ 19), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Caruso winning 2 times and Ilkel being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Caruso winning 4 and Ilkel winning 0. The last match between Caruso and Ilkel was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 10-01-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Salvatore Caruso getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:38:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Caruso and Ilkel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Caruso winning 0 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Caruso winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Caruso has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.44 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 240.37.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Caruso has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Caruso has converted 49.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 39.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
511
Rank
76
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
407
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
54% (419-355)
Career Total W/L
56% (401-315)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
36% (9-16)
$927,160
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Salvatore Caruso vs Cem Ilkel For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Caruso VS Ilkel
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Salvatore Caruso | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:38:30 | 0:38:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (31/57) | 54% (31/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (23/31) | 71% (22/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (17/26) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (23/57) | 30% (17/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Cem Ilkel
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Salvatore Caruso | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 36% (9/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (27/26) | 36% (20/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (240/235) | 44% (219/281) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 33% (4/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.48 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 117 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:6 | 1:28:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 223.67 | 190.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (809/1445) | 57% (879/1532) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (535/809) | 69% (610/879) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (309/636) | 47% (305/653) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (78/159) | 39% (38/97) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (627/1483) | 35% (505/1447) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 41% (7/10) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (4/3) | 29% (2/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (11/21) | 33% (8/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (6/11) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 70% (10/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 30% (10/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 13% (15/2) |
Salvatore Caruso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Michele Ribecai
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Vito Dell'Elba
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Salvatore Caruso
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
15 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Pietro Marino
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Beckley
Player
Salvatore Caruso
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Diogo Marques
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Salvatore Caruso
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
17
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Salvatore Caruso
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Timofey Skatov
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Caruso Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Caruso are available here and Ilkel photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
